|
Post by Doom on Jul 15, 2009 23:45:16 GMT
Chief TA obviously has had a major bust up with the management and is off to pursue his career elsewhere.
Other TA's messed about (again) by changing who they report to (hoping they'll get fed up and walk no doubt).
4 permanent Project Managers to go even though there aren't enough if them so TCS are helping out with some of theirs.
More bad news on the way I expect.
|
|
|
Post by getthedogs2 on Jul 16, 2009 19:33:52 GMT
4 permanent Project Managers to go even though there aren't enough if them so TCS are helping out with some of theirs. That is most certainly illegal - hope one or all of the 4 get the lawyers on the shifty gutter 'IS Leadership Team'!
|
|
|
Post by Legal Beagle on Jul 16, 2009 22:39:26 GMT
Unfortunately it isn't illegal. If there is a need to reduce headcount in a specific team due to a perceived reduction in the future workload then they can bin off permies but still reserve the use of TCS resources to backfill in times of peak work.
|
|
|
Post by A BTS person just on Jul 17, 2009 20:25:53 GMT
So, they once again play the game making the PM's go through the please save my job, ritu. When we all know that management have already made their choice of who is going. why do they make people go through this saga waiting 4 weeks before they publish the 'results'' nobody trust nobody now. In the meantime L&G shares tumble. Will the last one out turn off the lights.
|
|
|
Post by skipper on Jul 18, 2009 7:50:02 GMT
They are all at it L&G TCS everyone. Don't plead for your job just get yourself out there in the market. There still people out there worth working for, then leave at the most inconvenient time for the L&G. Happy job hunting.
|
|
|
Post by Observer Corps on Jul 18, 2009 14:48:19 GMT
The large corporates seem to constantly (and usually without success) attempt to boost their share price with these corrosive measures.
One could imagine that it's driven by the return on share options that are given to management as an incentive.
Trouble is the incentive is leading to the longer-term loss of what made the company great in the first place.
|
|